Perspectives
People
Skills and Relationships are Key to Business Results
Think
with me for a minute about the first day of a new job.
Perhaps some jitters accompanied by quiet excitement and anticipation.
You are focused on a new opportunity for professional growth. You’re feeling proud of yourself and determined to be a
success. On your first day you
are invited to lunch with a group from your department and the banter around
the lunch table makes you have buyers remorse. Your peers are focused on your new abrasive
supervisor and the scuttlebutt is that his behavior is tolerated because he
delivers results. They call him the “Teflon Man.”
He is slippery and seems to deflect senior management’s scrutiny.
Why? Because senior management believes the supervisor is competent.
He produces results for his boss, and isn’t that what really matters?
He leaves dead bodies in his wake but he gets the job done.
That’s the business of business.
Right? Suddenly you realize that you have filled the shoes of one his
casualties. Now your thoughts
immediately turn to, “What have I done?
How will I survive?”
Has
the drive to reduce business into processes that can be automated and
computerized – or re-engineered provided an all-too-convenient excuse to
forget that business effectiveness and efficiency depends on people?
The abrasive supervisor may meet management’s goals in the short
term, but what is the long-term result of his behavior?
Higher turnover? Lower Productivity? Diminished customer satisfaction?
Research proves that the price of turnover is very costly.
It has been estimated that approximately 80% of an employee’s annual
salary is the cost of filling a position.
Classified advertising, interviewing, training, downtime, etc. all play
a role in this figure.
What
is the cost of the poor supervisory relationship to the organization?
When employees have bad attitudes towards management if affects their
productivity - and bad attitudes are transparent enough to ultimately impact
customer satisfaction. People with bad attitudes toward their work are not
likely to go out of their way to truly serve the customer. They are not
focused on doing the best they can; they are focused on resentment and
survival. The price we pay for unsatisfactory supervisory relationships is
staggering, both in terms of bottom-line results and loss of creativity,
innovation, and human capital.
Now
think again with me for a minute. What if your company was filled with
employees who willingly made and kept commitments, who had outstanding work
habits, who had positive attitudes, who were willing to persist until they
succeeded who recognized and appreciated others, who managed their emotions
and who could be serious but also laugh at themselves and who loved their
supervisors? Wow!
That would be a great place to work!
How do we make that happen?
Teach
your managers, supervisors and team leaders people skills. Move away from the
directive style of management to the non-directive style of management.
The question arises, “Well if the manager is non-directive how does
one get results? “ Here’s how.
A
directive style manager uses authority as the primary motivational technique.
The manager gives a directive by telling employees what to do.
This style of manager generally does not seek feedback.
They make decisions and informing the employees of their tasks in an
impersonal manner. Sometimes supervisors try to get results with fear-based
motivation. When employees are
made to feel I have to, they either comply or rebel. When an employee feels as if they have to comply with a
good deal of frequency, they begin to resent.
When the resentment becomes too stressful to deal with employees will
opt for revenge. Someone needs to
be a victim when there is revenge.
A victim or target can be a co-worker, or a superior, or simply
malicious compliance. What a
vicious cycle! Soon the culture
becomes dysfunctional and the company’s reputation is at stake. When
employees perceive authority controls them they have a master/slave mentality. This directive management style attracts the type of
employee who doesn’t care if they have latitude to think for themselves, who
lack innovation, and who generally don’t accept responsibility for their own
performance; they simply do as they are told. What a miserable place to work.
On
the other hand, the non-directive manager attracts employees who accept
responsibility for their own performance, have a positive outlook, and who
don’t allow problems or setbacks to deter them from achieving their goals.
They are more innovative, and they will work toward continually
improving personal and team performance. Soon the reputation of the company is
known for the trusting management/employee culture.
The company becomes an employer of choice.
They have huge applicant pools of talent to draw from when there is a
job opening. People want to work
for this organization!
What
are the characteristics of the non-directive management style?
The manager believes the employee has responsibility for his/her own
performance so the manager is supporting, enabling and empowering.
Non-directive managers highly involve their employees in decision-making and
they create an open environment, inspiring team spirit and creativity.
This management style attracts employees who are responsible,
self-motivated, innovative and risk-takers.
How
does an organization become an employer of choice? First by understanding and
that people don’t leave companies; they leave supervisors.
So they make investments in their human capital.
They design a management development process which places an emphasis
on managing the environment, not the people.
About the Author: Barb Ashbaugh is the President of Trade Secrets, a performance management and training company headquartered in Texas. Working with clients over the past 16 years, Trade Secrets has developed a formula for improving retention and productivity up to 40%. To contact Barb go to http://www.Tradesecrets-training.com.